Re: Zope Tests: 74 OK, 19 Failed

Tres Seaver <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 03/30/2011 07:43 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:57:54PM +0200, Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
>> Test failures
>> -------------
>>
>> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux
>> From: buildbot at pov.lt
>> Date: Tue Mar 29 21:01:43 EDT 2011
>> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036574.html
>>
>> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
>> From: buildbot at pov.lt
>> Date: Tue Mar 29 21:27:19 EDT 2011
>> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036575.html
>>
>> Subject: FAILED : Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
>> From: buildbot at pov.lt
>> Date: Tue Mar 29 22:29:28 EDT 2011
>> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-March/036581.html
> 
> So, it's been a week, and the SourceForge bug [1] is still not fixed.
> 
>  [1] http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/ticket/18486
> 
> There are three other possible workarounds:
> 
>  1. Put ClientForm and mechanize into the buildout cache on the build
>     slave, so buildout doesn't try to go look for newer versions
>     elsewhere.  This ought to work: one of the four builders is still
>     green, for this reason.
> 
>  2. Add an allow-hosts option to buildout.cfg -- except it's generated
>     by a tool I'm not familiar with (zope.kgs.buildout).  Maybe I could
>     tweak ~/.pydistutils.cfg on the buildslave?
> 
>  3. Update versions.cfg in the KGS 3.4 to require a newer setuptools
>     version or distribute, then release it as KGS 3.4.2a1.  Except the
>     only setuptools version with the fix is a prerelease
>     (0.6c12dev-r88975).
> 
> I don't like (1) and (2) because they're local fixes: any user trying to
> actually use the 3.4 KGS will trip on this problem.  In that sense it's
> useful to have these buildbots red: we know the problem is not fixed yet
> for the users (assuming the 3.4 KGS still has any).
> 
> I don't like (3) because, ick, pinning a svn snapshot version?  Not cool.

It looks like the 'generate-buildout' script from zope.kgs uses a static
'buildout.cfg.in' template.  The following patch should do to add
'allow-hosts'::

- -------------------------- %< --------------------------
- --- src/zope/kgs/buildout.cfg.in	(revision 121173)
+++ src/zope/kgs/buildout.cfg.in	(working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
 [buildout]
 parts = test
 versions = versions
+allow-hosts =
+    pypi.python.org
+    *.zope.org

 [test]
 recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner
- -------------------------- %< --------------------------

Stephan, does that look OK to you?


Tres.
- -- 
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          [email protected]
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk2UdqIACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ54UgCgn0JBa3b68wnDV0HDb8wOBiuU
ldAAn1XC/7bqa21sg3urR2tRSh0q2jun
=vaQl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.