Re: CSRF protection for z3c.form

Raphael Ritz <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 4/6/11 7:43 PM, Roger wrote:
[..]
> I think to protect the form is just a part of a concept.
> Another part must be to prevent to inject JavaScript in
> user generated content. If an application allows to post
> JS in a blog post or comment etc. it should be possible to
> use easydmx to read and re-use the secure form token.
> (not approved but should work)

For that reason both CMF as well as Plone "clean"
user input by stripping nasty tags and such - at
least per default.

Raphael

>
> One of my bigger concern is also that such a token will
> break a lot of our tests which whould force us to use
> custom non security token generating form classes.
>
> I'm fine in general for implement such a concept
> in z3c.form but it should be optional.
> Why not offer additional form classes or a mixin
> for support such token?
>
> Regards
> Roger Ineichen
>
>> Laurence
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists -
>   https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>   https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
>


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.