Re: [Zope-dev] Reg. persisting data in ZODB via forms
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.bluebream,gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20110608174056.GB20013@platonas> |
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 06:20:26PM +0530, Joe Steeve wrote: > As I mentioned on a follow-up post, we figured the 'Persistent' part. :) > > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 13:29 +0100, Laurence Rowe wrote: > > My guess is that the ObjectModifiedEvent is dispatched to your > > object's parent and causes something to change there, with the side > > effect of storing your updated object. > > Even if the object's parent (a btree-container) had changed, will it > attempt to force-store its entire child-tree? I am trying to imagine the > effect of it on a huge tree. The smallest unit that is ever written to a ZODB is one persistent object (with all its nonpersistent attributes/items, recursively). BTrees use multiple persistent buckets for their state and are very efficient, storage-wise. But this only matters when you're adding/removing items to a BTree. If you're modifying a persistent object stored in a BTree, the BTree itself remains unmodified and does not need to be re-written Marius Gedminas -- Linux became only possible because 20 years of OS research was carefully studied, analyzed, discussed and thrown away. -- Ingo Molnar
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3vtCQACgkQkVdEXeem14+oGQCgkjd3kGG+WoXZn3EAiolRcJpa mIoAnArORkdj8Wod61Gmj/SgGPuCafUe =0JHa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----