Re: component registry navelgazing
Georges Racinet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stepping in… and +1 for the original question On 06/13/2011 04:26 PM, Charlie Clark wrote: > I know that the question has been answered but your question makes me ask > another: why would you want to adapt an object with itself? The sake of logical consistency should be enough. If you think of it, it's very similar to addition of zero : why would you want to add "nothing" ? Not having to predict where/if/when such special cases may blow in your face is very useful, and has indeed been very productive in the past. -- Georges Racinet, http://www.racinet.fr, http://anybox.fr Zope/CPS & OpenERP expertise, assistance & development GPG: 0x4862FFF7 identi.ca & twitter: gracinet _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 554 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJN9iPlAAoJEOAffZJiF+Z4FfEH/iyOuy1Qa7U0dLBZy+mA0A2b IWKacEv5j6XJrRDp9mVCA9olBCxxM+06eV/ZslTVdc+pIPCrS/H1z5EZTBVEI23J TwUmbDKXHkQnqH5GKtG+1Zn2KF9FxtPj5+qp/z0zZjIcklD6/IVvWQbZXarb1JCp tHlwHkql4Vqa/jboAlukOQkUPtd46eV7r0bmOtx1beDZvfkAP5DxGbSgry8g49dg Tl6DQSqzB4E8WULnKR89XI387z4xlXxzVWK5fkiovkyxpbgahR+pLZ4C/2Yub6qz fXnOtpbM+9dHLzfaGIV2bh82qOH2uPeHc2FbiONYkUzGl3Os7ZMCVNJheEtsr1g= =ZhT7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----