Re: direction

Martijn Faassen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 07/05/2011 12:22 PM, Jonas Meurer wrote:

>> Since we don't market Zope2 anymore, I think there's actually much
>> less confusion from this than we'd fear. It's just an internal version
>> number used in some buildout files, not something that has any
>> particular meaning.
>
> I don't like either of these solutions. And I don't agree with Hanno,
> that it's 'just an internal version number'. It will show up on
> zope.org, launchpad.net, and many more places.
>
> I would rather bump the version number to 2.20 to highlight the major
> changes, and keep the 2 as major for Zope2 versions.

I agree calling it Zope 2 version 3 would be very confusing. There's a 
lot of Zope 3 google juice around that would get muddled up even more.

Concerning not marketing Zope 2, heh, Zope and marketing strategies? I 
thought we were going to call "Zope 2", "Zope" now, so people will 
obviously be curious about this Zope thing... Never make any assumptions 
about a coherent Zope marketing strategy! I'll also drop in a reference 
to the existence of zope2.zope.org.

Regards,

Martijn

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.