Re: kudos...

Chris McDonough <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Message-ID <1312910399.24555.76.camel@thinko>
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 11:48 -0400, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> 
> > Kudos to whomever turned the "transaction" package's transaction manager into a context manager and was thoughtful enough to provide the "attempts" method (which returns a separate context manager, wrapping the txn context manager, and retries some number of configurable times).
> > This makes writing code that integrates with a web system that commits
> > or aborts as easy as:
> > 
> >         import transaction
> > 
> >         for attempt in transaction.attempts(attempts):
> >            with attempt as t:
> >                response = handler(request)
> > 
> >                if t.isDoomed():
> >                    t.abort()
> > 
> >                if commit_veto is not None:
> >                    veto = commit_veto(request, response)
> >                    veto and t.abort()
> > 
> >                return response
> > 
> > Very nice.
> > 
> > - C
> 
> 
> Yes, this is *very* convenient and I like to use it, but beware of the bug (it's not affecting you above because of the return).
> 
> According to the documentation, it's intended as a replacement for:
> 
>     for i in range(3):
>         try:
>            with transaction:
>                ... some something ...
>         except SomeTransientException:
>            continue
>         else:
>            break
> 
> So, presumably,
> 
>     for attempt in transanction.attempts(retries):
>         with attempt as tx:
>             do_something()
> 
> should break after the *first* successful commit.
> 
> It doesn't.  Instead, it commits do_something() ``retries`` times which is most probably not intended.

Not sure about that; I just return a value if it succeeds.  I wouldnt
expect it to know to break out of the loop without a return in there.

I wound up with this, FWIW:

def tm_tween_factory(handler, registry, transaction=transaction):
    # transaction parameterized for testing purposes
    commit_veto = registry.settings.get('pyramid_tm.commit_veto',
                                        default_commit_veto)
    attempts = int(registry.settings.get('pyramid_tm.attempts', 1))

    if not commit_veto:
        commit_veto = None
    else:
        commit_veto = resolver.maybe_resolve(commit_veto)

    def tm_tween(request):
        if 'repoze.tm.active' in request.environ:
            # don't handle txn mgmt if repoze.tm is in the WSGI pipeline
            return handler(request)

        try:
            for attempt in transaction.attempts(attempts):
                with attempt as t:
                    # make_body_seekable will copy wsgi.input if
                    # necessary, otherwise it will rewind the copy
                    # to position zero
                    if attempts != 1:
                        request.make_body_seekable()
                    response = handler(request)
                    if t.isDoomed():
                        raise AbortResponse(response)
                    if commit_veto is not None:
                        veto = commit_veto(request, response)
                        if veto:
                            raise AbortResponse(response)
                    return response
        except AbortResponse, e:
            return e.response

    return tm_tween

A little more verbose but still nice.

> 
> See https://bugs.launchpad.net/transaction/+bug/724332
> The patch attached to the bug report is just a test that proves that behavior is unexpected and gives a workaround.
> 
> The workaround is simple enough and I prefer to use transaction.attempts convenience rather than the typical try-except code above.
> 
> Still, we really should find time to fix this in the transaction manager code so that it behaves as expected. (Or change the documentation and tests).
> 
> Regards,
> 
>     Zvezdan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
> https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists - 
>  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
> 


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.