Re: RFC: Proposal for merging jbohman-zope.registry branch of zope.component
Chris Withers <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25/08/2011 06:24, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Maybe something like "zope.plugins" would be better. When I try
> to explain zope.component to people, I often explain it as a good
> generic plugin mechanism.
If we're renaming, we could also consider dropping the "zope" bit.
I never will understand the irrational fear and hatred of the "zope"
name but it's still there and I reckon we'd get a much more sensible
reception in the rest of the python world if we dropped it.
cheers,
Chris
PS: In passing, and for similar reasons, along with ease of
pronunciation and lack of package namespacing, it'd be great if buildout
2.0 could be just "buildout" rather than zc.buildout.
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )