Re: RFC: proposal to split zope.configuration into ZCML and non-ZCML related packages
Chris McDonough <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1315106519.9257.21.camel@thinko> |
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 10:59 +0200, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring <[email protected]> wrote: > > Splitting zope.configuration into core mechanics and ZCML support > > makes a lot of sense to me. > > > > So, +1 from me. > > +1 here too It turns out that we were using so little of zope.configuration in the Pyramid core that it was much to replace it than it is to port this stuff (and write docs/unittests) so I withdraw this proposal. FTR, apologies, it's a bit lame of me to not help with a zope.configuration Python 3 porting effort and just fork and steal bits of code I need. We do still depend on the entirety of zope.configuration in an add-on package named "pyramid_zcml", so if there is call to port that to Python 3, I may revisit this topic. - C _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )