Re: zope.testrunner and nose count doctests differently

Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Organization Simplon B.V.
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 11/03/2011 11:54 AM, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
> On 2011-11-03, at 0025, Chris Withers wrote:
>
>> I'm experimenting with using nose as an alternative to zope.testrunner
>> so I can take advantage of the junit and cobertura compatible xml output
>> offered.
> Using http://pypi.python.org/pypi/collective.xmltestreport might be easier? Not sure if it gives you everything you need, but works well for us Plonies.

It doesn't do coverage in a way jenkins can handle iirc. I have to run 
"bin/coverage bin/test" to get coverage data.


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.