Re: Revert removal of ++skin++ in Zope4?
Tres Seaver <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/16/2011 07:28 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:53, Charlie Clark > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am 16.11.2011, 12:49 Uhr, schrieb Lennart Regebro >> <[email protected]>: >> >>> Right. Could we standardize on skins or browserlayers plz? Having >>> both confuses the heck out of me. >> >> Definitely a topic that needs (re)-opening. From a CMF point of I >> think we're just about at the point where we could switch to browser >> layers, well, at least once CMF 2.3 has been released. But I think >> that CMF Skins still offer some functionality that you don't get >> with browser layers out of the box. > > When I said skins I meant ++skins++. CMF Skins must die. Note that for all their warts, they are *massively* more successful than the Z3 reimplementation, which was overengineered (I helped with that, I'm sure). In particular, the exceesive amount of ZCA majyk makes complicaterd uses of the Z3 skins very fragile (easy to misconfigure, hard to discover what you broke). Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [email protected] Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7DtUkACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ6m1ACfefhRA+UQGJEuFs8DTl/ADj3b IeUAoLcfBcOUTVAw9uLSYxRxdAMYV/An =EJ4l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )