security.public/private/protected decorators
Florian Friesdorf <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Matthew, Alan,
as discussed during ploneconf2011 I wrote the decorators:
security.public
security.private
security.protected
as successors to their declareX pendants.
All new code is fully covered (except a raise).
@all: please review AccessControl r123394 - r123399
security.protected('permission') returns a decorator and it should be
ensured that all those decorators are actually called, i.e. that the @
isn't missing.
flo
--
Florian Friesdorf <[email protected]>
GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083
Jabber/XMPP: [email protected]
IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 835 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOxICnAAoJEDj4maMMRfCDxE0P/R7cBhmXAt9DB8p/3hZ0jTbG 11UtS2Z0+f7MhpJLlZ5FY3JKJ7SCxOKI6U83xdnlj2F84yZNvc+l/PfvA60ra7Lk a99kKFUwkvJhwV7/zpjWOCVpaIM2zkggghyAZZLhju18D6RDNO9vqYnRDlOdl2DQ Js7jWzhGxz/7T4JG7D50dWQSRgr/O4cOQSl6n6CLmadfaFtoaoSR/Sl6ahlqfYWw UCdRbr43cuty6dtSBLaP7AFYeCf22LMHfbhM4v8Rt3+gUOnSxXt5Fkr5AqPuQ+DD AGTZY69uGncZoAVIR+GHOMKg7I60xhxLxClWS8+o6nWTMs5+Wh7UTcOjR/sZ629R NVQo12no4Y8znKIbmm4Wi0hHnHt/EVIEJrhsSz32tyFFtZItYH6CKdNPlpfo3zNE lf4xhbTPGLGL5MljaE9rjefkpw3m5MSw/+Y6Zq3QrI0Tqsr47E6jhwRWofkJrk1X W/QxYerX/8G1hZOdDEDYbGxhkP4p6E62RBGzsCCtz97HDhEHHoajGLEVyUTb27Pi H5aMJmgjfMatBcKsWwohaSuNpHQp95A4Pzr1hixqLpAWM93qBW3pm5/EYZkwgDeM JTGjmQEwJiRVVbqftT591m4rOZ+weXgnQzv9g8FdTVgT4pvVwag/qKrswovxXpoF zLVjP2zTBcGyuhnGADFS =1hWa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----