Re: Zope 2 WSGI investigation
Laurence Rowe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOycyLSBe+8k+SSiwP8n9Vu0rGKhr7Q_O3Yt==aA6mazaZC9Nw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 3 January 2012 08:34, Sylvain Viollon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Op 1 jan 2012, om 20:39 heeft Martin Aspeli het volgende geschreven: > >> >> Hi, >> > > Hello, > >> There are three known WSGI implementations of the Zope 2 publisher. >> I've had a look at them and made some notes about what I think >> provides the best story: >> >> ## Zope 2.13 WSGIPublisher >> > > [...] > >> >> ## infrae.wsgi >> >> Pros: >> >> * Clean and well documented >> * Properly emits publication events >> * Supports streaming > > Those two points are features I use actively in Silva, and where motivation for me to work on my > implementation. (I had a look before to repoze.zope2 and the default Zope 2 support, back in 2.12). > >> * Supports simplified virtual hosting with X-VHM-Host > > That is not completely true. I support setting the hostname, however to set a > virtual path, you need to do this during traversing, which is done in BaseRequest, > that I don't change (because it is a big large blob of code where you cannot really plug anything in it, or > change only a few line in it without changing everything). > > In production we use mod_rewrite to rewrite the URL with an old > VirtualHostMonster url and pass it to mod_wsgi with the help of the flags PT. What advantage is there to setting the X-VHM-Host header over just setting the Host header? Laurence _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )