Re: Zope 2 WSGI investigation
Alex Clark <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 1/11/12 5:59 AM, Sylvain Viollon wrote: > > Op 9 jan 2012, om 12:44 heeft Marius Gedminas het volgende geschreven: > >> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:01:29AM +0100, Sylvain Viollon wrote: >>> >>> You can't set a virtual path with the Host header, it is not valid >>> if you want to follow the RFC. After as well, you can include the >>> port in it, but I think you are not sure if you can't really know >>> if you should create https URL or not, you don't have this >>> information (this is not required only to be on port 443, and if it >>> is I am not even sure the port is correctly added in the Host >>> header). >> >> In the WSGI world it's usual to use the X-Forwarded-Scheme header to >> determine the scheme (http or https), AFAIU. >> > > I have nothing against using those headers, even if there disparities between > some of the implementations. > >> See e.g. http://pythonpaste.org/wsgiproxy/#the-proxy >> http://pythonpaste.org/deploy/modules/config.html#paste.deploy.config.PrefixMiddleware >> http://packages.python.org/Deliverance/proxy.html >> http://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid_cookbook/en/latest/deployment/nginx.html FWIW I tried to get Zope2's WSGI working recently with repoze.vhm and failed: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8865349/mod-wsgi-zope2-plone-virtual-hosting-configuration, though the concept of using HTTP_X_VHM_* seemed to make sense at the time. Alex >> > > > Regards, > > Sylvain, > -- Alex Clark · http://pythonpackages.com _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )