Re: Zope 4 release management
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL0kPAUOgrzo5WjKw4Lq42nw_Yc08LKGN9dAJ8k1LtribtEtEw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:40, Alexandre Garel <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm a bit amazed by this argumentation. I think one important thing is that > subversion is centralized while dvcs are not. And I think it's very unimportant. > With dvcs everyone got full history of zope libs. I personally find it a big > pro for a free software. You get that with svn too. > More over with dvcs someone may fork a product on his side (a branch of his > own, not on a zope server) and make it evolve, still having ability to merge > updates (and auto merge in dvcs are superior to the one found in > subversion). You can do that with svn too. The merging of it is easier with something like github or gitorious, but git in itself doesn't really help. //Lennart _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )