Re: ZAM/ZMI Demo
Sylvain Viollon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, Op 6 feb 2012, om 17:06 heeft Christopher Lozinski het volgende geschreven: > Very good point about different user types. Maybe we could have > different permissions on the different roles, and people only get to see > their version. Right now there is just a single ZMI permission. At > least in Zope 2 that was the case. > > So I suggest we have 3 new roles. > > System Administrator, Zope Administrator, Zope Developer. > > System administrator could view the database size, pack it, and start > and stop zope. That is about it. Zope administrator could also move > things around and delete things. Maybe add a few types of objects, > such as cache objects. Zope developer could add arbitrary objects. > > I think this distinction would go a long way towards resolving the > conflicts I have seen over the years about the ZMI. Having different roles will help greatly yes, and even if we end up with multiple packages that would still be a great idea to have, but again, if I don't expect (want) my users to use this browsing interface at all, why should I load all its code when the server start ? That just increase the application footprint for nothing, and designing the new ZMI in two or three packages (not 50) would solve it. And I am against 50 packages too, as setuptools get exponentially slower when you load entry_points, as it check that all dependencies of your packages are installed. Regards, Sylvain, -- Sylvain Viollon -- Infrae t +31 10 243 7051 -- http://infrae.com Hoevestraat 10 3033GC Rotterdam -- The Netherlands _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )