Re: We need to change how code ownership works.
Jim Fulton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPDm-FjZd=wPx813pKE5V08-tF26WKKcMfKdTihpCzJEP9nxSw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Charlie Clark <[email protected]> wrote: ... > Again, as Jens has repeatedly said we should not conflate the separate items > of toolchain and service provider. +1 > Zope Foundation has hardware and a proven > track record in hosting. Is anyone actually criticising this? FTR, in the case of svn.zope.org, it's ZC hardware and hosting with a lot of much appreciated help from Jens. We're doing a pretty ok job (if you ignore a near catastrophe) in providing what is, by today's standards, a bare-bones service. User management is awkward. We lack any automated support for review, and a number of other services provides by github and bitbucket. svn.zope.org doesn't take much of my time most of the time, but it's still a potential (and occasional real) time suck for me that I'd love to jettison. Life is short, why do this ourselves when there are excellent services available? Jim -- Jim Fulton http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )