Re: [announce] NEO 1.0 - scalable and redundant storage for ZODB

Jim Fulton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.zodb,gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Message-ID <CAPDm-Fi9715pdXg0SqAkxymUjL66nKredOVvoLcUNfh-3D6rWQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Vincent Pelletier <[email protected]> wrote:
...
> I forgot in the original mail to mention that NEO does all conflict
> resolutions on client side rather than server side. The same happens in
> relStorage, but this is different from ZEO.

That's good.  I'd like to move ZEO in this direction.  I'd also
like to stop hanging conflict-resolution on classes and have
some kind of registry, so that people can set CR policies
independent of class implementation.

I didn't realize that relstorage did client side CR, but thinking
about it, it has to work that way, since there's no relstorage
server.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.