Re: Current state of Python 3 migration

On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 05:13:37PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:42:35PM -0500, Tres Seaver wrote:
> > On 12/19/2012 01:57 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > > Would it be possible to release zope.security 4.0.0 any time soonish? 
> > > Then new buildouts would get new zope.proxy and new zope.security,
> > > while old buildouts would happily continue to use old ones.
> > 
> > I had hoped that the 4.0.0 marker would signal Py3k compatibilty, but
> > don't have gumption to finish that port today.
> 
> Whoops.  I think I accidentally stepped on your toes by releasing
> zope.pagetemplate 4.0.0 without first checking if the Py3k port was
> complete.  I just assumed it was, after noticing the 4.0.0 version
> number in CHANGES.txt.

I added a tox.ini and 'setup.py test' support to zope.pagetemplate
trunk and saw that Py3k porting is blocked by zope.security not working
with Py3k yet.

No pressure ;-)

> > Maybe a 3.9.0 release,
> > made by branching from 3.8.3 and just bumping the zope.proxy dependency?
> 
> That sounds reasonable.

Call that a +0.5 vote, because I don't trust my judgment.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
Software programmers should not think that they have to write multi-threaded
programs. It's too hard, and the payoff is too little. And it absolutely isn't
where the industry is even going.
        -- Linus Torvalds

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFQ0yz2kVdEXeem148RAnhQAJ9Y7dLxkhgFwezK0zQsLhRIcFw/EgCdEn3E
9PkCuorVyiyu0ouhtQxq2Js=
=pRKb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----