Re: ZTK 2.0 process

Jan-Wijbrand Kolman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 2/26/13 5:04 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> The process for a ZTK 2.0 release isn't really well defined. I'm not
> sure if Jan-Wijbrand and Christophe are still interested in working on
> ZTK releases.

I'm personally and from a business-perspective still interested in the
ZTK and to have Grok to be a relevant (to the ZTK process) "consumer" of
the ZTK.

That said, I've been off of the radar for a while concerning the ZTK
because: 1) busy and 2) Grok's proven to be fairly stable and thus did
not need much maintenance for quite a while.

So:

* Thanks Stephan and Hanno to get this ball rolling again

* Thanks to whoever ported so many of the ZTK packages to Python 3 already!

* I'll need to blow of some dust from my ZTK-knowledge and how Grok is
using it to give you useful input to your questions.

regards, jw

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.