Re: Version Numbering for Ported Packages

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 08:35:46AM -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Monday, March 11, 2013 10:09:51 PM Tres Seaver wrote:
> > Also, is somebody running / reporting tests via
> > Travis?  Where are those results going?
> 
> They should be running for all packages. I have turned off any notifications 
> pending an agreement of where we want the reports to go. The easiest thing 
> right now would be a Wiki page that shows the status icon for each package.

FWIW whenever I get a failure notification from Travis about a package
that doesn't have a .travis.yml, I uncheck the Active checkbox in Github
repo settings.

Packages without a .travis.yml are treated as Ruby packages, and,
obviously, always fail.

> Note: I think most packages pass fine under Travis, but some are failing for 
> some obscure reasons.

An overview would be good.

I could add a Travis column to http://zope3.pov.lt/py3/, I suppose.  The
image URLs are trivial to generate, assuming Travis knows about every ZF
repo on Github:

  https://api.travis-ci.org/zopefoundation/${reponame}.png?branch=master

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFRPz6TkVdEXeem148RAqynAJ0TqlsjK7yPtWjZikm9i5eT0nQuTQCcDqf2
N+hEphSd/lQSTR4tStLwLL0=
=aI3h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----