Use of python3 compatibility packages six vs. futurize
Martin Häcker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi python3-porters, At the Ressurection-Sprint in Halle, I learned that most of python 3 porting in zope is done using six <http://pythonhosted.org/six/>. I've stuck to it during the work there, as it seemed to be the standard that other zope packages have adopted. But since futurize <http://python-future.org> offers a much more comprehensible implementation of the 2to3 Script and seems to be better maintained - I'd like to use it instead. Especially because it promises to make porting to py3 while maintaining py2 compatibility easier and faster. Any good reasons (besides consistency) not to use it? Is there some sort of consensus on this topic that has been reached before? Best Regards, Martin Häcker _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )