Re: css_class value not propagates to subfields of DateTime form

Hi Clemens,
>  recently there has been a bug report that the "css_class" value is in
> fact ignored when rendering DateTime fields:
> 
>  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=3547899&forum_id=1702
> 
>  Indeed the problem is that the value needs to be propagated to the
> subfields embedded in the DateTime field.
> 
>  The bug can be fixed via a simple "on_value_css_class_changed" helper;
> however on the formulator-general list I have been uncarefully discussed
> the option of having different css-classes for the date and time values.
> 
> As nobody came up with a real use case for this I guess there is no use
> case for it.
 
Uhm, there is one in my head. Required fields get a different background
color. The datetime field can have required date fields, but the time
fields can be optional. It would good to make this visually apparent.

>  So if nobody objects on this list I will check in the simple fix
> sometime near the end of the next week (after I found the times to write
> tests for it :-> )
 
I hope I haven't made your simple fix more complicated :)
kit


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Infrae . . . kit blake . . . infrae.com . t +31 10 243 7051
Hoevestraat 10 . 3033 GC Rotterdam . NL . f +31 10 243 7052