Re: Pending patch to some "CheckBoxField" issue

Martijn Faassen writes:

 [...]
 > Clemens Robbenhaar wrote:
 > >  After thinking a while about it I tend to apply the patch anyway, as:
 > > 
 > >   - it fixes the issue if the the form is rendered by form.render()
 > > 
 > >   - if the initial "<form>" tag is not rendered by formulator, thus the
 > >     hidden field is not mangled into the form, it will just do nothing;
 > >     i.e. I do not think it makes things worse.
 > 
 > Well, it will make the code harder to follow and the conditions more 
 > complicated. But if there is truly no better way to solve this..

 I do not know of any. I have asked a while if someone knows a better
solution without getting a reply, thus I thought there really is no
(known) better solution.

 The alternative is to keep the issue unfixed in the main software and
maybe put a note about where to get the patch to fix it.
 I am pretty indifferent about it (that's why I am asking the list
to make a decision I don't want to make ;-)

Clemens