Re: Re: sidnei's reindexing improvements

On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 12:57:38PM -0800, Rob Miller wrote:
| Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| >On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:12:54AM -0800, Rob Miller wrote:
| >| these are definitely band-aid measures, and they don't fix the problem 
| >| entirely
| >
| >Yes they do fix the problems in Archetypes. The rest of the problems
| >are in CMF. See thread started by Alec.
| 
| i still think they're band-aid measures.  IMO, the idea of a catalog 
| multiplexer should live in the CMF, not in AT, and all catalog indexing 
| should be handled by this multiplexer.

<snip>

| note that Florent has already got this working in CPS.  ultimately, it 
| should live in CMF.  i'm not convinced we need ben's proposed messaging 
| system to make it happen, but i am convinced that the current strategy 
| sucks, and that while your changes do eliminate some redundancy, they 
| are just a stopgap measure.

Yes, call it band-aid-stop-gap-measure if you want, but it's a proper
fix, just the size that fits in a minor revision (1.3.6) and that took
about two years with no action from anyone. Please line up your
proposals for the next major revision of archetypes.

-- 
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems, LLC.
http://enfoldsystems.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click