Re: sidnei's reindexing improvements

Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 07:18:43PM -0200, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> | Yes, call it band-aid-stop-gap-measure if you want, but it's a proper
> | fix, just the size that fits in a minor revision (1.3.6) and that took
> | about two years with no action from anyone. Please line up your
> | proposals for the next major revision of archetypes.
> 
> Just to be clear, I'm not against using events. I'm against waiting
> for the next-next tecnology when we can fix (or band-aid, or stopgap)
> existing bugs with existing resources and *just then*, when the bug is
> at least alleviated, wait for the next-next technology.

we're on the same page here.  remember, my first message was to make 
sure that your changes DID get merged.

for some reason, though, i think i'm seeing more multiple unindexing 
errors when i run the CMFPlone tests using AT from the plone 2.1 bundle 
than i am using your reindexing branch... that's why i thought the 
changes hadn't been merged in the first place.  i'm re-running those 
tests now, though; it's possible it was operator error causing the problems.

-r



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click