Re: ANN: Golden Roof AGX Sprint

Reinout van Rees wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> 
>>  - People already use AGX to refer to ArchGenXML. There will be all
>> kinds of confusion between the old and the new code. Since one is
>> generating AT schemas and the other is generating Z3 code, they are
>> probably going to have parallel lives for some time to come, and
>> having to qualify "AGX-the-Z3-one"  vs. "ArchGenXML-the-old-one"
>> each time we write or talk about it will be hell.
> 
> The new agx will be able to generate all sorts of things. zope3 code.
> The existing plone+archetypes code. Plain python code.

I agree that archgenxml and genisis are both crap names. AGX is a good 
name. It sounds good and is reasonably unique. Being meaningless is of 
no consequence what so ever when it comes to names as AGX will come to 
mean whatever AGX does... like "A Generator for X" which is what it 
seems to be becoming. and the new version is even if it is a new 
begining is AGX 2.0 (or AGX NG or something). It's mostly backwards 
compatible right?




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642