Re: ArchGenXML thought
Martin Aspeli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Reinout van Rees wrote: > > Matt wrote: >> In this guise I would like to add >> support for building CMFFormController scripts. Since the >> ArchGenXML/UML modelling environment includes GUI pieces such as the >> <<action>> and <<view>> stereotypes, it might be nice to be able to >> represent all one's logic within that same modelling environment, >> including the chains through .cpt .cpy and .vpy defined by their >> associated .metadata files. I guess there could be a few flavours of >> development: >> >> 1) at least produce .cpt .cpy and .vpy and associated .metadata files >> with enough information that warnings are issued in the event log >> >> 2) define the above and expose the .metadata files so at least we can >> see them all in one environment >> >> 3) use state diagrams to define the .metadata chains >> >> This is just my guess; but it is something I wouldn't mind implementing. > > Great! Just do it! > > This would make it much more visible what's happening behind the scenes. > It's not such a big win in UML effort versus coding effort as the > workflow, but I'd sure like to use it. > Me too. I think for documentation purposes, this would be awesome. When you have a complex chain of FC actions, it can be quite tricky to see how it all fits together. :) Martin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ArchGenXML-thought-t1397418.html#a3782681 Sent from the Archetypes - devel forum at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642