Re: Options for making AT schemas more adaptive
Rob Miller <ra-UE+B0n23d/[email protected]> Tue, 02 May 2006 17:20:43 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dieter Maurer wrote: > Rob Miller wrote at 2006-5-2 11:07 -0700: >> ... >> the first step in this process, i'd say, would be to define >> ISchemaConsumer and ISchemaProvider interfaces. > > Why do you need both "ISchemaConsumer" and "ISchemaProvider"? i think it makes sense to have an interface that explicitly specifies that a given object supports AT schemas. > What should an "ISchemaConsumer" be at all. Note that schemas are > not "consumed". At least, it is a very badly chosen term... i chose 'consumer' just because it seemed the right balance to 'provider'. i'm not attached to the name. maybe ISchemaSupporter would be better. other suggestions welcome. -r ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642