Re: Re: Options for making AT schemas more adaptive
Dieter Maurer <[email protected]> Wed, 3 May 2006 20:46:55 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rob Miller wrote at 2006-5-2 17:20 -0700: >Dieter Maurer wrote: >> Rob Miller wrote at 2006-5-2 11:07 -0700: >>> ... >>> the first step in this process, i'd say, would be to define >>> ISchemaConsumer and ISchemaProvider interfaces. >> >> Why do you need both "ISchemaConsumer" and "ISchemaProvider"? > ... >i chose 'consumer' just because it seemed the right balance to >'provider'. i'm not attached to the name. maybe ISchemaSupporter would >be better. other suggestions welcome. What is an "ISchemaConsumer/Supporter" in contrast to an "ISchemaProvider"? Maybe, you want to express "I am using a schema" via an interface. In this case, "ISchemaUser" might be an appropriate term. However, I still do not understand why you want to use an interface to express this. -- Dieter ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642