Re: Re: Options for making AT schemas more adaptive

Dieter Maurer <[email protected]> Wed, 3 May 2006 20:46:55 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Rob Miller wrote at 2006-5-2 17:20 -0700:
>Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> Rob Miller wrote at 2006-5-2 11:07 -0700:
>>> ...
>>> the first step in this process, i'd say, would be to define 
>>> ISchemaConsumer and ISchemaProvider interfaces.
>> 
>> Why do you need both "ISchemaConsumer" and "ISchemaProvider"?
> ...
>i chose 'consumer' just because it seemed the right balance to 
>'provider'.  i'm not attached to the name.  maybe ISchemaSupporter would 
>be better.  other suggestions welcome.

What is an "ISchemaConsumer/Supporter" in contrast to
an "ISchemaProvider"?

Maybe, you want to express "I am using a schema" via an interface.
In this case, "ISchemaUser" might be an appropriate term.
However, I still do not understand why you want to use an interface
to express this.


-- 
Dieter


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642