Re: Options for making AT schemas more adaptive
Rob Miller <ra-UE+B0n23d/[email protected]> Wed, 03 May 2006 14:39:38 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dieter Maurer wrote: > Rob Miller wrote at 2006-5-2 17:20 -0700: >> Dieter Maurer wrote: >>> Rob Miller wrote at 2006-5-2 11:07 -0700: >>>> ... >>>> the first step in this process, i'd say, would be to define >>>> ISchemaConsumer and ISchemaProvider interfaces. >>> Why do you need both "ISchemaConsumer" and "ISchemaProvider"? >> ... >> i chose 'consumer' just because it seemed the right balance to >> 'provider'. i'm not attached to the name. maybe ISchemaSupporter would >> be better. other suggestions welcome. > > What is an "ISchemaConsumer/Supporter" in contrast to > an "ISchemaProvider"? > > Maybe, you want to express "I am using a schema" via an interface. > In this case, "ISchemaUser" might be an appropriate term. yes, ISchemaUser is the best name i've heard. > However, I still do not understand why you want to use an interface > to express this. hopefully my reply to whit will clarify what my thoughts were. -r ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642