Re: RichDocument attachments and Lingaplone

Jens W. Klein wrote:
> Am Tue, 09 May 2006 17:00:25 +0200 schrieb Harald Friessnegger:
> 
> 
>>sometimes it's necessary to be able to add new imageattachments or
>>fileattachments to translations of a richdocument.
>>
> 
> 
> something complete different, but why this complicated usage of
> attachementfileds with all its implications if one could use an
> ArrayField from Products CompoundField around an FileField (or any other
> Field)?

From what I can tell, RichDocument's attachments are more secure and
generally nicer for the user.

another 0.02 EUR



-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642