Re: Moving MoreFieldsAndWidgets to collective?
Rocky Burt <[email protected]> Wed, 24 May 2006 07:29:59 -0230
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | ServerZen Software |
| Message-ID | <1148464786.6435.6.camel@localhost> |
On Wed, 2006-24-05 at 10:00 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote: > ... except we ought to re-write the way fields and widgets (esp. the > latter) work in Archetypes :) Actually, what might be a decent migration pattern would be to create an AT widget/field pair that can encapsulate a z3 widget/field pair. That way people could migrate to z3 type techniques at a more gradual pace by continuing to use AT as-is but with z3 schema's and fields. - Rocky -- Rocky Burt ServerZen Software -- http://www.serverzen.com News About The Server (blog) -- http://www.serverzen.net
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 191 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEdC6S1PysfgyHvo0RAuefAJ43nJCluy1TUgIEQc9MvOM+H7AEsQCgo1cG t9NelcUqgWvqKSYsHdQkYjA= =BqVN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----