Re: RFC: proposal for schema refactoring pt. I
Roché Compaan <roche-kb4xc5yObU3kQYj/0HfcvhBnub05S5/[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:59:23 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1152809963.22107.12.camel@kwaaitjie> |
On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 11:59 -0400, whit wrote: > ================================= > Proposal for Schema Refactoring > ================================= Hi Whit How will schemas be defined in future? I know how to create an AT Schema now and I know how to create a z3 schema but it is not entirely clear to me how AT Schema will be defined in future. I remember a thread on this list some time ago where fields of an AT schema was described as mini content types. It was said that the this makes it difficult to translate AT Schemas to the z3 idiom. Now and then I see proposals on this list of how AT will be refactored but none of them have been concrete enough for me to get a clear idea of where things are going. Maybe it isn't that concrete yet? -- Roché Compaan Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Archetypes-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/archetypes-devel