Re: RFC: Schema Refactoring, first steps

Rob Miller <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:47:05 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:24:55 -0400, whit wrote:

> I added rocky's requested clarifications. feel free to add language (or
> proprosals):
> 
> https://svn.plone.org/svn/archetypes/proposal/schemaproprosal.txt

i've read all of this, and, while i agree in general with the design
sentiments, i'm not quite convinced that it's the right way to go. 
honestly, my thought is that i'm not sure we should be investing this much
energy in making AT better.  as you all know from my other posts, i'm
strongly in support of making the Z3 stuff and the AT stuff both play
together well within the Plone UI and within the same content objects. 
but that's specifically so that we can ease the transition off of AT.  i'm
quite content to change AT just enough so that we can make this happen
smoothly, and i'm suspicious of any major efforts that go toward improving
AT rather than toward improving the Z3 story.

-r




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642