Re: RFC: Schema Refactoring, first steps
Rob Miller <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:47:05 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:24:55 -0400, whit wrote: > I added rocky's requested clarifications. feel free to add language (or > proprosals): > > https://svn.plone.org/svn/archetypes/proposal/schemaproprosal.txt i've read all of this, and, while i agree in general with the design sentiments, i'm not quite convinced that it's the right way to go. honestly, my thought is that i'm not sure we should be investing this much energy in making AT better. as you all know from my other posts, i'm strongly in support of making the Z3 stuff and the AT stuff both play together well within the Plone UI and within the same content objects. but that's specifically so that we can ease the transition off of AT. i'm quite content to change AT just enough so that we can make this happen smoothly, and i'm suspicious of any major efforts that go toward improving AT rather than toward improving the Z3 story. -r ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642