Re: Schema provider/CA lookup status

Martin Aspeli schrieb:
[..]
> 
> Note that there's no reason why one adapter implementation couldn't choose
> to delegate to or subclass another, so generic/common behaviour can still be
> managed.

Exactly.

So assuming for the moment that we are talking about independent
schema extensions one could simply aggregate all schema componts
registered for a certain type/interface if there where something
like a schema (component) registry including support for 3rd-party
products/packages/extensions/components - what do we call it these
days? ;-) to register their stuff on install/config load/whatever.

Dealing with conflicts OTOH might be impossible to solve generically
but maybe the registry proposed above could at least try to detect
potentially conflicting extensions and produce a warning -
don't know ...

But don't let my little detour hold you back from what you
are doing, Martin ;-)

Raphael

> 
> Martin


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV