Re: Archtypes SQL Storage

> It should be possible yes. The problem is that no-one did it before so
> the effort to get it to work is unknown. With enough time it is
> certainly doable.

I also think it is doable, but I am relativly new to plone and unfortunatel=
y don't have the time now ;-)

But I am wondering how the other companies manage their long time and shard=
 data storage.
I think it is not a problem from out of space. It is quite a common and tri=
vial szenario for a company to have long time stored data outsourced in a R=
DBMS and yet having the desire to get everything beautifully mangaged by an=
 (maybe content type like) object, something similar to a EJB in J2EE, that=
 offers automatic form generation.

Or are all of you using the ZODB for long time and application shared stora=
ge and dont feel the need to outsource at all?

Well, I am quite new to Plone and I feel there is something missing... but =
I don't know. Just can't believe that there is no product out there that su=
pports this.


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:01:33 -0300
Von: Sidnei da Silva <[email protected]>
An: Dennis Schulz <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [Archetypes-devel] Archtypes SQL Storage

> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 05:31:49PM +0200, Dennis Schulz wrote:
> | Hello List,
> | =

> | I looked at the SQLStorage package that is part of Archtypes, but found
> out that Archetypes objects stored through SQLStorage still have a presen=
ce
> in the ZODB, which means it's not a solution if you totally want to get
> rid of Data.fs bloat. (It is also the policy and requirement in our compa=
ny
> to have everything in outsourced in the MySQLDB and I can't change this)
> | =

> | I am looking for a way of using the Archetype Content Object only as the
> View (presentation layer) for easy rendering of the forms and mapping them
> directly to a relational database without any interference of the ZODB.
> | =

> | Is it possible to modify an Archetype that it looks up the content items
> completly in the relational database and not first in the zope DB (that
> maps to the rel. database like in SQLStorage)?
> | I don't see a reason why one should store the same object 2 times in the
> ZODB and MySQL.
> | =

> | Any help and hint will be appreciated, Thank you very much!
> =


> =

> -- =

> Sidnei da Silva
> Enfold Systems                http://enfoldsystems.com
> Fax +1 832 201 8856     Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214
> =

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D=
DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Archetypes-devel mailing list
> Archetypes-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/archetypes-devel

-- =

GMX DSL-Flatrate 0,- Euro* - =DCberall, wo DSL verf=FCgbar ist!
NEU: Jetzt bis zu 16.000 kBit/s! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easi=
er
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D1=
21642