Re: Obj. creation & portal_factory in AT1.5 & Plone 3 and onwards?
"Sidnei da Silva" <sidnei-/awGbKECNgO/3pe1ocb+swC/[email protected]> Mon, 4 Dec 2006 19:51:20 -0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel,gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/4/06, Martin Aspeli <[email protected]> wrote: > Not really; it's very incompatible with how CMF and Archetypes work, and > smart people have tried. > Fate does temporary object creation as well, as > far as I know. Yes it does, but it's saner in the sense that it doesn't try to fake permissions or hierarchy, and never leaves turds in the catalog. > The answer is to adopt Zope 3 content types, which have proper add > forms, but this evolution is gradual. That's not a real answer. It does not provide many of the features that Archetypes provides. In fact, if you are willing to drop *some* but not *all* the features at object creation (like full-object validation), then the branch I'm working on for Fate (enfold-cleanup branch) does provide a reasonable mid-term solution. -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systems http://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV