Re: implication of removing portal_skins
Nathan Van Gheem <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL8hw9Gyha5T_2nkjAmaonm+S6=YJs=6+jXcKj2FNmvLiu52PA@mail.gmail.com> |
As far as I can tell, less TTW configuration has never been a goal of Plone. In fact, we continually try to do more of it. Case in point: dexterity, registry and diazo editing interfaces. Having the main target audience of larger, complex sites does not necessitate less TTW configuration. Let's get back to the original topic. I am merely trying to present a document to help integrators move to use the modern technologies and how we advise them in doing that. -Nathan On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 3, 2013, at 20:42, Nathan Van Gheem <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Just because we say we want to focus on one sector does not mean to > abandon the other. > > Sometimes goals are just not compatible. For example I strongly feel that > a Zope instance should only run a single website and that configuration > should be in configuration files and not in databases, which is why I > dropped all use of plone.registry, ZMI properties, local component > registries, etc. in favour of z3c.appconfig. That allowed me to make things > a lot simpler and manageable by normal admins without any Zope knowledge, > but I had to abandon other things. > > My main point is that you need to have a single target audience in mind > for all roadmap decisions, and I feel that that has been missing so far. > Which customisation options make sense will depend strongly in your target > audience. For enterprise-style usage TTW configurable is probably a strong > anti-goal, while it would be very important for people who run 500 simple > sites in a single instance. So depending on who you want to cater to you > will need to make different design decisions. > > Wichert. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers