Thanks Yuri - my hope is that this document *will* be the basis for such a tutorial.
I see no one has jumped in to edit the document… https://github.com/collective/collective.developermanual/blob/master/source/misc/plone5way.rst
Maybe this is the wrong list to post it to, because most of you will consider yourselves developers, whereas the concerns being expressed at the removal of portal_skins and other TTW mechanisms will be held mostly by themers and integrators.
On the other hand, if you see things in this list that themers and integrators are used to doing now and you're aware of "better" (newer) ways of doing those things, please chime in now or don't complain that themers and integrators should RTFM. We want this to become part of TFM. :)
Kim
On Jul 4, 2013, at 1:45 AM, Yuri <[email protected]> wrote:
Il 03/07/2013 20:17, Nathan Van Gheem ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> Kim Nguyen is wanting to take up the effort of making sure we fill the
> functionality hole correctly when we remove the use of portal_skins in
> Plone 5.
>
> He, and many others, are concerned that doing quick edits on
> functionality in plone will become very difficult with the removal of
> portal_skins. When managing MANY sites, as he does, being able to do
> quick edits through the ZMI is very important to the power of Plone
> and his deployment.
>
> Kim created a document with his concerns enumerated and asked me to
> respond. I have, and we've now put that document, unlinked, in the
> collective developer docs with the idea of the document eventually
> morphing into a howto on doing things the "plone 5" way without
> portal_skins.
>
> The document is located at:
> https://github.com/collective/collective.developermanual/blob/master/source/misc/plone5way.rst
This is a very nice and effective document. Why don't put tutorial
online with the old way vs the new way?
A question: for sites with the old customizations, how the migration can
be handled?
>
> Warning, my responses are NOT assumed to be the absolute correct
> response. These are just things I've thought of right now. Please, if
> you can explain things better or know of a better way, modify the
> responses.
>
> Also, this is no a place or a discussion of why portal_skins is bad or
> wrong for the future of Plone. We've had that discussion, done :)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Nathan
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plone-developers mailing list
> Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Plone-developers mailing list
Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.