Re: Removing plone.app.collection 1.x branch?
Patrick Gerken <lists-Hgn/qBBDvdzwVR/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
How about renaming it to 1.x_attic or something? I am against deleting branches, even if they don't actually represent a version line. On 09/05/2013 11:34 AM, Timo Stollenwerk wrote: > Hi, > > I copied/merged the plone.app.collection 1.x branch (AT) into master > (was DX) and moved the master branch to the (discontinued) 2.x branch (DX). > > The Dexterity-based plone.app.collection has been merged into > plone.app.contenttypes and will not be developed further. > > I switched the coredev sources back to p.a.collection master, so they > don't use the 1.x branch any longer. > > Is it save to remove the 1.x branch now to avoid that people commit to > it or is there any good reason to keep it? > > Timo > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Plone-developers mailing list > Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk