Re: lxml versions
Laurence Rowe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOycyLQ+Z7hNRkEZdnf+G2cxbND=PBP=2mwku2xaHreAh7Z85g@mail.gmail.com> |
On 29 October 2013 09:08, Matt Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > Before I go digging through code, > anyone know why we are pinned to lxml > 2.3.6 with Plone and not using lxml 3.x? > I vaguely remember availability of Windows binaries being an issue when I tried to bump from 2.3.6 to 2.3.7 some time ago. Laurence ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep Android apps secure. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers