Re: Replacing local roles on users with local roles on groups
Matt Hamilton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Encolpe Degoute <encolpe.degoute@...> writes: > > Hello, > > All this sounds really interresting to me. > > I'm thinking about 3 questions: > > You do you manage the Owner role and rights? > Zope and Plone still have some specific behavior for that role. I'm not > saying that we should keep them, I just want to know how you manage them. It looks like IndexableObjectWrapper explicitly removes the Owner role from the list of local roles indexed. Which I guess makes sense, as you don't want *any* Owner to be able to access it, just the user who is this owner, who is already added to the list. I guess we could make an optimisation and check if the current owner (or user you are adding role for) is already in a group defined for a parent object (ie. would be added by local role acquisition) and then not necessarily create a new group just to add them. > Anonymous and Authenticated, Members groups are very importants when you > connect the large organizations' directories. Do you will modify them? I'm not planning on modifying them. I *think* they should work as they currently do. > CMFPlacefulWorkflow was developed for Plone 2.1 and 2.5 and need some > refreshing^Wrecoding. Are you working on this too ? No, I'm not planning to do anything on this. I'm hoping this is a separate issue. -Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk