Re: Could it be possible to support configuring with *.cfg instead of *.zcml?
Asko Soukka <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I'm sorry for asking the wrong question. I was just learning, why zope.configuration requires xml (and learned that it doesn't), to answer some questions about why we cannot configure in Python or in *.cfgs like the other Python frameworks do. I agree that we already have issues with having mixed bag of zcml and grok examples in our documentation. Yet it would be nice, if we could choose which approach to prefer: http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/GROK-RULES-I-WANT-IT-MORE-Was-The-grokless-madness-and-unable-to-create-a-simple-form-tt7564217.html#none Cheers, Asko Dylan Jay wrote: > Agree. We have to aim for an order of magnitude easier to overcome the > effort of educating people of a new way to do something. > > On 24 Nov 2013 11:11, "Martin Aspeli" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > How is one more way of doing something with a different syntax to > what is in all existent documentation going to make anything any > easier? ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk