Re: do we need plone.app.customerize? was: [Plone-Users] Insufficient privileges on folder_contents
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAL0kPAV_mZy+HY2HkxvxRSr25gE8PFFKMoSQre2sJPxSwfwTiA@mail.gmail.com> |
I agree it's important to have a TTW story for Plone. You can today, without creating a Python module (or even use third-part modules) do loads of things: 1. Create new content types with new schemas. 2. Import themes and modify them. 3. Change the workflows and permissions. 4. Set up "collections" that will update automatically. 5. Choose what information is shown on different pages by setting up portlets, including worklists. 6. Set up email notifications for various events. 7. And of course infinite amounts of minor configurations. 8. And I probably even forgot something. This allows you a lot of TTW flexibility. The only thing of this you even need to go to the ZMI for is if you want to make new workflows. I have customers where I set up a demonstration server of Plone to see if they liked it. They did. A year later they wanted some changes, and it turned out they took that plain Plone demo site and started using it as a procurement management system. :-) Now of course, there is another level of flexibility given when you can create new templates, and the next level of flexibility is when you can develop things in Python. And I do want a story to make that easy. But does it really have to be TTW to be easy? The only benefit I can see with TTW is that it allows me to fix urgent bugs in minutes instead of say, 15 minutes. I don't think the drawbacks are worth it. I think it's perfectly fine to draw a line between configuration and development, and say that configuration is TTW and development is not. I know there are a lot of people doing TTW development and saying that it is an absolute must, but I'm not 100% convinced that you haven't actually looked into the alternatives that are available. So are there alternatives to TTW? Well, how about a way to let you edit a jbot directory remotely, via WebDAV, as long as you are in development mode. As just an idea. I'm sure there are other alternatives and somebody can come up with an even better way to do it. But I really don't think that Plones TTW story needs the feature of allowing us to edit templates through a browsers shitty built-in editor. That is not the actual feature people want when they talk about Plone and TTW. Neither is the feature they want the possibility to store Python code in the ZODB. That's not what gives you the added value. //Lennart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk