Re: lxml versions
"David Glick (Plone)" <david.glick-z4DKO/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/19/13, 8:02 AM, Alessandro Pisa wrote: > On 29 October 2013 22:46, Laurence Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >> The experimental.cssselect packages renders css selectors to xsl:template >> match compatible location selectors (which are not quite the same as >> xpaths.) Ideally this would be implemented on top of cssselect, but doing so >> cleanly would probably involve changes to cssselect itself. A worthwhile >> project if someone has the interest. >> > In my opinion it would be nice to ship Plone 5 with a newer version of > lxml, otherwise there is a big chance that developers will get in > trouble using other libraries. > > For example today I stumbled upon an issue with the latest version of > WeasyPrint requiring lxml 3. > > If I am able I would try to work on this at the Cathedral Sprint! > Sure, just update it in the coredev buildout and make sure bin/alltests still passes before you push it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk