Re: Supposed behaviour of the "visible ids" setting
Timo Stollenwerk <tisto-z4DKO/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 23.12.2013 23:07, schrieb David Glick (Plone): > On 12/23/13, 1:58 PM, Dylan Jay wrote: >> >> >> On 24 Dec 2013 08:06, "Eric Steele" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > On 23 Dec 2013, at 10:44, Luca Fabbri wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Timo Stollenwerk tisto-z4DKO/[email protected] >> <mailto:tisto-z4DKO/[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> I'm currently working on the PLIP to move all control panels in >> Plone to >> >>> use z3c.form/p.a.registry and I was wondering about the supposed >> >>> behaviour of the "visible_ids" setting. >> >>> >> >>> On a vanilla Plone 4.2/4.3 it seems this setting does not have any >> >>> effect at all. If it is enabled, there is no additional id field >> on the >> >>> edit view of a content object and it is always possible to edit the id >> >>> of a content object through the folder_contents view. >> >> >> >> I used this few days ago on PLone 4.2 and it was working as expected: >> >> remember that you must enable both the site general setting and the >> >> >> >> same preference in the user's preferences. >> > >> > That's correct. The control panel checkbox controls access to the >> personal preferences setting. You're basically saying "People are >> alloChangingee the id field if they want to." It doesn't automatically >> turn it on sitewide. Does anyone turn on the id field by default? >> >> Anyone know the original idea why setting the id is so many steps to >> enable? >> Given the user can do it by actions rename anyway. Btw Changing URL >> via rename is a extra training step we always have to do since its not >> intuitive. >> > > I think we should get rid of the preference and the global setting, and > have the Short Name field always appear on the Settings tab when editing > an item. That way it's a bit out of the way (not cluttering up the > initial edit page), but it's also easier to access than either the > rename dialog or turning on the visible ids preference. +1 Do we need an additional PLIP for this or should that be part of PLIP 10359 (controlpanel -> z3cform/p.a.registry)? Timo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk