Re: Announcement of a little browser demo of plone.jsonapi.* in action
Ramon Bartl <ramon.bartl-gM/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
> Neat. Two questions:
>
> (1) License should be GPL, no? Not trolling, just curious.
>
> (2) Why route such that everything (API links) are by UID vs. placeful
> traversal?
Thanks:)
(1) I thought MIT would be a good choice because it's less restrictive,
but it was more of a gut decision...
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3902754/mit-vs-gpl-licence
(2) I wanted a (kind of) RESTful API, where the content lives below resources like
`documents`, `folders`, `images` etc.
Basically it's because most of the JS Frameworks like ExtJS, Backbone etc. expect
CRUD URLs like /documents/<document id> or /images/<image id> for their Proxies.
Greets Ramon
--
Ramon Bartl
ramon.bartl-gM/[email protected]
https://github.com/ramonski
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Plone-developers mailing list
Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 235 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iF4EAREIAAYFAlLx8DQACgkQW+yPiOIAg2qEQQD/YDki1z3IkO2GcK2OSNRL7dIu dslp2kZWPZH5o5C3U1wA/3tuFoPrQtKylY9ADmqSeJc0lQoao5spyMSr1NAlqIJh =tDm9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----