Re: Zope version cfgs
Simone Orsi <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANJtmqArJJb0DNXqG5VpvAO6DxSX8vQMh8r7Au_nX_6RQHxdGw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Eric, any progress on this? Looks like 4.3.3-pending/versions.cfg si broken since it finds http://dist.plone.org/release/4.3.3-pending/zopeapp-versions.cfg but not http://dist.plone.org/release/4.3.3-pending/zope-versions.cfg Maybe you forgot one? :) Thanks! S. On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Eric Steele <[email protected]> wrote: > On 21 Feb 2014, at 19:09, Maurits van Rees wrote: > > Eric Steele schreef op 22-02-14 00:51: > > How do we want to handle referencing zope/zopeapp/ztk versions.cfg files > now that downloads.zope.org is no longer hosting them? Right now, we've > got the cfgs for the latest tags in the 4.3.3 and 5.0 buildouts with the > thought of putting them into the relevant release folders at > http://dist.plone.org/release/. > > What seems like the better option would be to pull in the old ones as > well and host them all somewhere on dist.plone.org. This gets them > behind our CDN and helps out those running older releases of Plone. Is > there any reason we couldn't do that? Is anyone willing to own this > task? > > Eric > > Is download.zope.org really no longer hosting them or is it scheduled to > stop servicing those requests? It seems good at the moment. > > You mention downloads.zope.org (plural) which is not available. But > note that there is downloads.buildout.org (plural) and download.zope.org > (singular) which are both available. So I wonder if this is simply a > mixup between two domain names. > > It could be good to host these files ourselves, to avoid problems when > download.zope.org really is down. It is one server less that needs to > be up for some buildouts to finish correctly. > > BTW, I have a small script that reads a buildout config file, parses the > extends lines and downloads them: > https://gist.github.com/mauritsvanrees/1097587 > I use that to download the extends of the plone versions.cfg for the > Plone version that a client buildout is using and I put those files in > version control so the buildout does not need to go online for those > extends lines. > > Cheers, > > -- > Maurits van Rees: http://maurits.vanrees.org/ > Zest Software: http://zestsoftware.nl > > Sorry, I meant download.zope.org. According to this email from Hanno in > June <http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/download-zope-org-td7566681.html>, > "... the Zope infrastructure team has decided to discourage relying on > download.zope.org for production deployments...The next Zope 2 releases > won't be available from download.zope.org anymore, so coredev and any > release machinery should probably be adjusted." > > So, old ones are still there, but the latest Zope2 release, 2.13.22, is > not. Currently the cfgs for that live in GitHub tags<https://github.com/zopefoundation/Zope/blob/2.13.22/versions.cfg>and in our > coredev buildout<https://github.com/plone/buildout.coredev/commit/eee10225facad6abc9d96c892660ac40ec2d13f6>. > In the process of releasing 4.3.3, I've added that to the release > directory on dist.plone.org<http://dist.plone.org/release/4.3.3-pending/zope-versions.cfg>. > > > So the question is really this: From this point forward, we need to host > the version pins for any new Zope releases that Plone uses. Since we have > the infrastructure in place to do so in a far more stable manner, should we > host the old ones as well? > > Eric > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications > Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. > Read the Whitepaper. > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Plone-developers mailing list > Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list Plone-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers