Re: Lost changelogs
ida277 <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nathan Van Gheem-3 wrote > Can you share an example of lost changelogs? Right now, I stumbled over plone.app.discussion, which I cannot make to work with Plone-4.3.3. The versions.cfg pins p.a.discussion to 2.2.12, so I thought I have a look at the product's site on PyPI, to see what has changed and noticed the missing entry for 2.2.12. Same goes for p.a.portlets, which I just reviewed with kind guidance of David Glick, synchronizing commited bugfixes between three separated branches and restoring the missing logs. Still it's not clear, how future-commits affecting several branches will stay in sync. And there was another one I which I cannot recall right now, but I'll add it here, when it hits me again. Nathan Van Gheem-3 wrote > Policy is usually yes, for every change, put an entry in. Ok, thanks for confirming. Leaves up the quest, why it's not happening and how we can ensure proper logs for the future. To me, this concerns the people merging pull-requests, and if noticing something's wrong, to educate the comitter about it (besides of the usual official note in a doc somewhere, which probably exists already), would you see that likely? To me a concept of a responsible person and a seconder, could be of help I think, and aren't product-owners ment to hold that role? As a fairly fresh core-comitter, I'm just asking to get more clarity, maybe the approach is actually less hierachic/person-centric. Regards, ida On Fri, May 2, 2014, at 07:04 AM, ida277 wrote: > Hej everybody, > > I'm lately experiencing with quite a few core-packages, that parts of the > changelogs are missing, how can we avoid that? > > Respectively I'd assume package-owners are responsible for proper > releases > and there is a competent seconder, if the owner can't be available. > Please > forgive me, if I have overseen something obvious, but what is actually > our > policy about that? > > Additionally I'd expect a changelog-entry to be equivalent with the > corresponding pull-request-comment, yet often they don't show up in GIT's > history, or not in a way that I can easily find matching comments, how do > you (all of ya Ploners) think about that and what do you think should be > our > "best-practice"? > > Curious about enlightnings and with best regards > Ida > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/Lost-changelogs-tp7571208.html > Sent from the Core Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE > Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get > unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform > available. > Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." > http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs > _______________________________________________ > Plone-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Plone-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plone-developers -- View this message in context: http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/Lost-changelogs-tp7571208p7571212.html Sent from the Core Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs