Re: Broken build since four days

Timo Stollenwerk <tisto-z4DKO/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.plone.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am 21.06.2014 09:12, schrieb Timo Stollenwerk:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> I spent the entire afternoon yesterday to fix the Plone 5 build that has
> been broken since four days. The Plone 5 AT job is still broken.
> 
> The idea of a CI system is that people are notified immediately of
> regressions, so those regressions are easy to fix, because they are
> fixed by the person who introduced the bug in the first place and the
> person usually worked on the code recently anyways.
> 
> If I (or anybody else) fixes those regressions for you, it takes me a
> lot longer than you or anybody who worked with the code recently.
> 
> I know our CI system is not perfect and it's sometimes hard to see what
> went wrong and we sometimes get false positives. Though, I'm constantly
> working on improving that situation and I always monitor the build,
> notify people manually and fix or restart the build if things go wrong.
> 
> In order to keep a green build, I usually just revert commits that break
> the build and notify people so they can just fix the regression later.
> This only works though if people do small commits that are easily
> revertable and people do not commit on an already broken build.
> 
> It is just not acceptable to keep the build broken for more than a
> couple of hours. A red build keeps me up at night, because this is an
> invitation for more regressions that are introduced without notice,
> leading to a build that is completely broken and a situation when nobody
> feels responsible because the CI system can't tell people any longer if
> they break things. See this recent discussion to illustrate what I mean:
> 
> https://github.com/plone/plone.app.jquerytools/commit/4fb9eae8b7b3a5a16a9992fc069ed560d7afdfe8#commitcomment-6734229
> 
> 
> We had this situation before and usually David, Eric, me and others have
> to fix lots of failing tests before being able to make a release. This
> is not only highly frustrating, but it also means that new Plone
> releases take a lot more time than necessary.
> 
> -
> 
> About the Plone 5 AT job, it's still broken since this build:
> 
> http://jenkins.plone.org/job/plone-5.0-python-2.7-at/1481/
> 
> The Plone 5 build that triggered that build was:
> 
> http://jenkins.plone.org/job/plone-5.0-python-2.7/2589/changes#detail1
> 
> Those were the two commits that are responsible for the two tests that
> currently fail on the Plone 5 AT job:
> 
> https://github.com/plone/buildout.coredev/commit/29c9a070d6367d025c7e671fc2eff9c27c02be05
> 
> 
> https://github.com/plone/buildout.coredev/commit/5dd14b8e7b51234d8ef62068b50408ff04342e6d
> 
> 
> Please have a look and fix those test failures as soon as possible. As
> said before, I can't just revert commits any longer because things have
> become to complicated already.
> 
> We have lots of new Jenkins slave machines ready to put into production
> and this broken build is keeping us from being able to use them. I can't
> fully test the new machines if not all builds are green.

The Plone 5 AT job is green now:

http://jenkins.plone.org/job/plone-5.0-python-2.7-at/1548/

This pull request merge introduced the test failures:

https://github.com/plone/Products.Archetypes/commit/a6abb32f7ea2c6a4c830306c816ec591c90b13bb

I amended the tests accordingly. Please double check.

The Grok problem still persists.

Timo

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions
Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems
Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data.
Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.